In the August 30, 2023 edition of the New York Law Journal Religion Law column, partners Barry Black and Christopher Byrnes examine the key differences in religious institutions vis-a-vis other nonprofit organizations and why that matters. In particular, the article dives into key structural and operational considerations ranging from autonomy and governance, employment and tax considerations.
To read the full article click here.
.
Chris Byrnes, the outgoing General Counsel of The Heritage Foundation, will be joining the religion law firm Nelson Madden Black LLP as a partner as of September 1, 2023.
Mr. Byrnes will be launching the Washington, D.C., office of New York-based Nelson Madden Black.
For the past five years of his seven years at Heritage, Mr. Byrnes served as the organization’s chief legal officer in its senior management team, advising on and overseeing all of Heritage’s legal, regulatory, and compliance matters. Mr. Byrnes also was the legal advisor and primary liaison to Heritage’s Board of Trustees. With more than 500,000 members, The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s largest and most broadly supported conservative research and educational institution and was ranked as the No. 1 think tank in the world for “Significant Impact on Public Policy” for three years in a row.
A graduate of Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service and Georgetown University Law Center, where he was president of the student chapter of the Federalist Society, Mr. Byrnes previously served as in-house associate counsel for a major proprietary university headquartered in Herndon, Virginia; senior attorney-advisor at the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights; attorney-advisor at the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights; and attorney at Defenders of Property Rights. He is an active member of Alliance Defending Freedom’s Allied Attorney Network.
Barry Black, a partner in Nelson Madden Black, said, “Chris’s arrival speaks volumes about how far Nelson Madden Black has come since we opened our doors seven years ago. Chris brings a whole new level of organizational advocacy to our firm as well as a wide network of contacts in Washington, D.C., and throughout the nation. We look forward to continuing to expand our religion law practice in New York and Washington, as well as nationally.”
Commenting on his new role as a partner in Nelson Madden Black, Mr. Byrnes said, “I have devoted my career to mission-oriented clients, and I look forward to focusing on religious clients and causes, defending those facing religious persecution, and protecting the First Amendment rights of individual and organizational clients.”
Nelson Madden Black, whose practice is limited to religion law, represents religious institutions and associations, municipalities, universities, clergy and other clients in a variety of disputes ranging from governance, property, and employment matters to religious liberty and other First Amendment claims.
In the March 6, 2023 edition of the New York Law Journal Religion Law column, partners Barry Black and Jonathan Robert Nelson discuss numerous benefits religious corporations can access through reviewing their bylaws and updating them to reflect current structure and operations.
To read the full article click here.
In the November 7, 2022 edition of the New York Law Journal Religion Law column, partner Barry Black and associate Sarah E. Child discuss various ways the federal government has taken action in regard to religious liberties in areas such as education, enforcement and government accountability. The article touches on how the government has deployed resources in these areas that may further broaden the acceptance of religious freedoms and allow for a greater ability for people to exercise their First Amendment rights.
Read the full article here.
In the May 24, 2022 edition of the New York Law Journal Religion Law column, partner Barry Black examines the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and examines how SCOTUS decisions have sided towards secularism. The column presents prior written opinions from SCOTUS justices then delves into a way forward towards an appropriate implementation and interpretation of the clause.
Read the full article here.
In the March 7, 2022 edition of the New York Law Journal Religion Law column, partners Barry Black and John Madden take a look at a widely expected Supreme Court decision that would strike down as unconstitutional restriction in a student-aid program in Maine that prohibits using that aid to pay for schools that provide religious or sectarian education. They also review a prior U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit decision and the likely impact of the Supreme Court ruling.
Read the article here.
Vaccine mandates are becoming increasingly prevalent among both public and private employers in New York and at least half of the states in this country. Nevertheless, the Constitution, federal statutes, and New York State laws require employers to provide exemptions from such policies to employees who raise objections that are religious in nature and sincerely held.
CLICK HERE for practical guidance on how to go about considering and assessing a religious exemption request.
Vaccine mandates are becoming increasingly prevalent among both public and private employers in New York and at least half of the states in this country. Nevertheless, the Constitution, federal statutes, and New York State laws require employers to provide exemptions from such policies to employees who raise objections that are religious in nature and sincerely held. One effective way to inform your employer of your sincerely held religious objections to its vaccination mandate is to pen a notarized personal statement, accompanied by a letter from a religious official who can attest to your deeply held beliefs.
CLICK HERE for practical guidance on how to go about seeking a religious exemption.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a significant reversal of the District Court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. In Keil v. The City of New York and its companion case Kane v. de Blasio, the appellate court determined that plaintiffs Keil and Kane were likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that New York City’s vaccine mandate was unconstitutional. The decision can be found here.