Religious Community Eagerly Awaits U.S. Supreme Court’s New Term – August 2021
In the August 27, 2021 edition of the New York Law Journal Religion Law column, partners Barry Black and Jonathan Robert Nelson look back at recent key rulings from the Supreme Court and look ahead to the SCOTUS’s new term and upcoming religion law cases on the docket. A particular case of note, Carson v. Makin, No. 20-1088, challenging Maine law stating that since more than half of Maine’s school administrative units (SAUs) do not operate a public secondary school that the SAU may “pay the tuition … at the public school or the approved private school of the parent’s choice at which the student [from their SAU] is accepted.” However, under Maine law a private school must be “a nonsectarian school” and several families have claimed that this requirement infringes on several federal constitutional rights, including theirs rights under the Free Exercise Clause.
How RLUIPA Protects the Right To Use Land for Religious Purposes – May 2021
In the May 28, 2021 edition of the New York Law Journal Religion Law column, partner Barry Black and associate Sarah E. Child take a close look at the RLUIPA statute and how recent decisions have affected the interpretation and application of the act. Our lawyers focus in on the land use section that provides important religious freedom protections pertaining to houses of worship and religious schools—from zoning and landmarking laws that discriminate based on religion or that unjustifiably infringe on religious freedom
Is ‘Substantial Equivalency’ The Next Religious Freedom Fight? – March 2021
Partner Barry Black and associate Sarah E. Child examine whether school requirements will be the next legal battle religious institutions will face as the New York State Education Department moves forward with the proposed regulation, Substantial Equivalency of Instruction in Nonpublic Schools, which broadly examines the criteria required for non-public schools to meet a “substantial equivalency” standard to their public school counterparts. Barry and Sarah review recent employment cases and how those precedents may translate and be interpreted when viewed through an education-focused lens.
When a Corporation’s Members, Not Its Trustees, Make the Decisions – November 2020
Partners Barry Black analyzes the duties, powers and limitations of “managing officers” of religious corporations operating under New York’s Religious Corporations Law (RCL) and how two landmark New York Court of Appeals decisions affect the interpretation of the RLC and the role of trustees when key decisions are made regarding the organization.
U.S. Supreme Court Expands Religious Freedom in Key Rulings – August 2020
Partners Barry Black and Jonathan Robert Nelson discuss three recent SCOTUS decisions that show strong support behind religious freedom. The analysis of these cases provide some clarity and guidance to all types of religious organizations on matters such as school aid, employment discrimination and contraceptives.
Considerations for Religious Institutions in Time of Crisis – May 2020
Partners Barry Black and John B. Madden dive into timely, distinct issues facing religious institutions during this uncertain time amidst the Covid-19 crisis and offer practical guidance and insight to stay ahead of growing concerns.
Security for Houses of Worship: The Law, and Practical Steps To Take – March 2020
In the March edition of the Religion Law column in the New York Law Journal, partner Barry Blackand counsel Lane Paulsendiscuss assistance for houses of worship from recent government regulations, the First Amendment implications of these government actions, and offer a guide for steps that institutions can take to protect themselves.
Broad Tax Exemptions Benefit Congregations – November 2019
In the November edition of their latest New York Law Journal Religion Law column, Barry Black and Jonathan Nelson discuss a tax exemption that may be a little lesser known than the parsonage allowance but might provide significant tax relief to qualifying congregations.
When Can Courts Decide Disputes Between Local Churches and Their Denominations? – August 2019
In their latest New York Law Journal Religion Law column, Barry Black and Jonathan Nelson tackle a subject that has led to decades of confusion in the legal system and woven a complex web of decisions to interpret: when can courts decide disputes between local churches and their denominations. Check out the full article as Barry and Jonathan review the law and suggest solutions to mitigate risk across the board.
Hiring and Firing Clergy Of Congregational Houses of Worship – May 2019
In the Friday, May 31, 2019 issue of the New York Law Journal, NMB partners Barry Black and Jonathan Nelson examine the differences of between hierarchical and congregational governing structures of religious institutions, and the understanding of the roles that trustees and congregations have authority over of hiring and firing affairs. Barry and Jonathan also outline practical considerations for congregations to be mindful of when making decisions about clergy.
How Courts Paved the Way For the Eruv – March 2019
Partner Barry Black authored an article for the New York Law Journal featured in their March 1st edition.
The article touched on the centuries-old practice of Orthodox Jews preventing them from pushing or carrying objects outside their homes on the Sabbath and on Yom Kippur, yet those prohibitions are lifted within an eruv, a ritual demarcation of an area.
Barry discusses recent and historical decisions on the practice and offers insight into how both sides of the community should approach the practice.
Religious Institutions and Trustees: An Unorthodox Relationship – November 2018
Barry Black and Jonathan Nelson discuss in their recent Religion Law column featured in the New York Law Journal some examples highlighting the rather unorthodox relationship between religious organizations and their trustees. The two Nelson Madden Black partners dive into a variety of cases which have laid precedence to the opaque guidelines for religious organizations, trustees and even members of congregations.
Religious Accommodations: How Far Must Employers Go? – August 2018
Religious accommodation disputes can lead to a variety of claims against employers. In their most recent Religion Law column for the New York Law Journal, Barry Black and Jonathan Nelson of the religion law firm Nelson Madden Black review and explain the law related to these kinds of religious accommodation claims and discuss the efforts that both employers and employees are expected to make in an effort to resolve them.
The bottom line, according to Mr. Black and Mr. Nelson, is that, in many instances, there is almost nothing more important to an employee than his or her religious beliefs. The law recognizes that, and requires that employers do so as well – within limits.
When #MeToo Leads To Litigation Against a Church – May 2018
Under the ministerial exception, a minister’s discrimination lawsuit against his or her congregation cannot be sustained as violative of the First Amendment. Does this principle apply to sexual harassment claims? What if the harassment claim in no way involves the hiring or firing of the minister? The courts are split on this question. How will NY’s courts decide the question? Read the New York Law Journal’s most recent Religion Law Column by partners Barry Black and John Madden.
Congregations Transferring Real Estate: When Is Court Approval Needed? – March 2018
Partners Barry Black and Jonathan Robert Nelson co-authored the New York Law Journal’s inaugural Religion Law column. The article focuses on the approval necessary prior to a religious institution’s transfer of real estate as set forth in New York’s Religious Corporations Law.
This was the first article in a new quarterly series for the New York Law Journal on Religion Law. Partner Barry Black has been designated by the NYLJ as its Religion Law Columnist.
Exceptions and Exclusions Benefit Religious Institutions and Clergy – September 2017
Barry Black and John B. Madden authored an “expert analysis” article for the New York Law Journal discussing several anomalies in which the law treats religious institutions and clergy uniquely, including certain tax exemptions, employment status of clergy and Title VII provisions.